
" "
Published on
September 29, 2026

When writing about the iconic Australian poet Gwen Harwood, Colleen Keane evokes in The Sydney Morning Herald that “Poetry finds sources of creativity in myth and tradition, but most of all in raw, uncensored life experience.” This is precisely what Harwood does - she draws upon fundamental values of mortality and the passage of time, nature, love and friendships, with all the evocative beauty and rich precision of rhythm, meter, and rhyme schemes embedded in the poetic form.
Harwood is a quintessential Australian poet, with much of her writing featuring her personal influences by both the sunny suburbia of Brisbane in her younger life and the colder solitude of Hobart following her marriage. As such, much of her poetry harks from Australian culture and the natural world - but it does so in a way that sculpts out universal human truths. Harwood’s poetry is marked most compellingly by this ability to draw out divine clarity and honest brilliance from the ordinary, mundane, and specific experiences of the individual.
Who better, indeed, as a key staple of the Common Module’s focus on “the emotions and qualities related to individual and collective experiences”? As her body of work winds through universal anxieties and joys, we are positioned to emotionally reflect upon these experiences as they will and must manifest in each and every one of our lives - experiences like love, and loss, and growing old. It is important too to recognise Harwood’s mischievous qualities too - her work often aimed to subvert and satirise those in power, ranging from post-WWII patriarchal ideologies to the unyielding hand of literary editors, offering us important insights in light of the module’s focus on “agency and conformity”.
The purpose of this text guide is to familiarise you with Harwood’s body of work and establish a clear foundation for which you may begin to understand Harwood’s artistry - and, consequentially, lay the groundwork for top marks in your Common Module essay for English Advanced.
As with all other English modules, the Year 12 Common Module requires that students establish a clear understanding of the societal and personal contextual influences for your composer and text. This section delves into the key contextual pillars that you should know in order to successfully navigate Harwood’s work.
Following the traumatic horrors of the Second World War, Western societies faced an aggressive push towards domestic renewal and suburban stability. In 1942, Australian Prime Minister Robert Menzies famously delivered his speech on “The Forgotten People”, praising the Australian middle class and emphasising values of family and self-sacrifice. This idealisation of the “nuclear family” and return towards traditional gender roles characterised the tone of government policies over the 1950s and 1960s.
Harwood sardonically critiqued such a reductive commodification of female domesticity, and instead venerated the transcendent beauty of these small spaces occupied by women. She was well known for using a range of male monikers and alter egos within her publishing, and famously used the name “Walter Lehmann” to lampoon the editorial industry. Although critics such as Jennifer Strauss have posited that these were purely pragmatic actions to enable the publishing of her work, Colin Dray has argued alternatively that:
the ingenious way in which she uses these personas to expand her poetic craft further
than the confines of a page, explore the presumptions of authorship that a reader
brings to any text…
As such, Harwood’s work was rooted in her praise for the often overlooked, smaller spaces of femininity and womanhood, which fluidly shift into her satire of patriarchal structures within her context.
Harwood has quoted Ludwig Wittgenstein’s work as “informing her entire opus”, as a key figure of language philosophy that influenced and inspired much of her poetry. She references him through indirect allusions and even explicit references, in poems such as ‘Last Meeting’:
The world, said Ludwig Wittgenstein,
is everything that is the case.
The warmth of human lips and thighs…
Wittgenstein was an Austro-British philosopher who established himself with his theories of logic and language, and was best known for his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus in 1921. Although his perspective on linguistics and truth evolved across his lifetime, his main conceptual argument was that rigid structures like language may mirror the world, but cannot ultimately capture the mystical and ephemeral. Harwood’s choice of quotation from ‘Last Meeting’ is a clear reflection of this view, arguing that cold, academic intellect is unrivalled by felt emotions and experiences like “the warmth of human lips and thighs”. Wittgenstein thus informed a large part of the philosophy and ideas conjured in Harwood’s poetry.
Although Strauss has previously argued that Harwood’s work “offers little of doctrinal certainty”, other critics including Sarah Golsby-Smith have posited that Harwood’s work subtly reflects her Christian influences. Harwood’s personal context was shaped by the strength and prevalence of Anglican communities throughout her lifetime.
The components of Anglicanism born from the structured prayer and aesthetic rituals of Roman Catholicism are prevalent in Harwood’s work, notably her frequent use of images of water and candlelight, and the musical cadence present in her work that is reminiscent of hymnals and liturgy. However, just as Anglicanism is influenced by a Protestant rejection of absolute papal authority and therefore a focus on small communities of worship, so too does Harwood draw upon the divine value of mundane spaces.
Golsby-Smith notes that in Harwood’s ‘Lamplit Presences’ essay, she fondly describes her house in Brisbane as a “small weatherboard cottage on stumps” rather than a “heavenly mansion”, supporting the view that Harwood especially venerated the presence of the divine within understated, domestic worlds.
Key Harwood biographer Alison Hoddinott wrote that Harwood described her childhood growing up in the sunny suburbia of Brisbane as a “blessed city of sunshine and colour.” Harwood’s poetry is marked by personal references to this envisioned haven encircling her family line of “strong, self-reliant Australian women” - for instance, referring to her childhood home in Mitchelton in ‘The Violets’.
Hoddinott describes Harwood’s move to Hobart following her marriage to linguist Bill Harwood in 1945 as a source of “dislocation”, embodying “the greyer days of her exile”. This sense of alienation and isolation from the lost pastoral paradise and strong matriarchs in Brisbane prefigured much of Harwood’s later work, especially when discussing and satirising the marginalisation of women and female identity in post-war Australia. Nonetheless, much of her poetry still returned longingly to the sun-drenched days of her childhood, often referring to the natural environment of Brisbane as a sanctuary within her work.
Harwood’s childhood was also marked by her talent in piano, studying under Handel scholar Dr Dalley-Scarlett and playing the organ at All Saints’ Anglican Church, Wickham Terrace. She also continued to teach music at St Christopher’s Church of England School for Boys, Brookfield.
Aside from poetry, Harwood was also acclaimed for composing 13 librettos across her lifetime (the spoken or sung dialogue or lyrics in an extended musical work such as the opera), collaborating with other prominent Australian librettists such as Larry Sitsky and James Penberthy. Her love of music and its rhythm and meter would often feature in her choice of poetic conventions, as discussed in greater detail in the Form section below.
Harwood’s body of poetry acts primarily as a response to and subversion of emotional and philosophical dilemmas of mid-20th century Australian life. Her use of formal structures enabled her poetry to become unified, aesthetic objects to ground her audience in the sanctuary of crucial human experiences like love, domesticity, and the passage of time.
In her analysis of Harwood’s composition of librettos, Alison Wood notes that:
Words and music, as Harwood rightly noted, are indissolubly wedded in both
performance and on the page. For, if words are mechanisms for evoking meaning, then
words and music interwoven are not two opposing systems periodically co-mingling, but
are truly multi-modal…In this context words may even be pure music.
Similarly, Sarah Golsby-Smith distinguishes the poetic form from other language forms in that it draws upon musical and visual qualities of language beyond only the semantic. This is reflected in Harwood’s tight structure, using the precise metrical frameworks of musicality to evoke the harmonious experiences of humanity that Harwood is interested in spotlighting. For example, Harwood mimics a Bach fugue in her layering of multiple voices in poetry such as ‘Father and Child’’s diptych structure.
Although much of her poetry draws upon the rich precision of poetic conventions, including structured stanzas and clear rhyme schemes, Harwood will occasionally disrupt her natural rhythmic baseline with fluid, enjambed lines. This is particularly reflected when her poem seeks to answer key ontological questions, swelling into an emotional climax of transcendence in response.
Alison Hoddinott, a vital champion of Harwood’s work and her close personal friend of forty years, wrote in The Australian Dictionary of Biography that Harwood possessed “delight in the subterfuge” and wearing “masks”, “[leading] her to create further fictional alteregos”. Although not a prominent feature of the prescribed poems, this use of pseudonyms and alternative identities was a deliberate literary device to form her mischievous social critique and satire. This leads us onto Harwood’s use of the Victorian dramatic monologue to give voice to these characters or alteregos, immersing the reader within their psychological depths.
Often, however - and most markedly in the poems we are interested in - Harwood’s voice shifts towards a reflective first-person perspective, echoing her nostalgic and elegiac views. As mentioned previously, these were often anchored in specific Australian landscapes, allowing the physical environment to act as a catalyst for her philosophical meditations.
Harwood self-reflexively venerates the capability of art forms such as poetry to represent lived, shared moments across time. Both explicitly and implicitly, Harwood critiques conventional linguistic structures and classical ideas of philosophical intellect, which has been commonly attributed back to Harwood’s interest in Wittgenstein. For example, ‘The Sharpness of Death’ explicitly challenges philosophers who “cut themselves, and bleed,/and know that knives are sharp,/but prove with complex logic/there’s no such thing as sharpness.” – that is, adhere within their writing to cold logic. Instead, in ‘Beyond Metaphor’, Harwood venerates art that can capture pure and honest humanity - “Only Mozart, perhaps, found the right tone/to make things bearable.” In this way, Harwood frequently engages in metapoetic references to what she strives to achieve and capture within her own form.
Below is my recommended overview of the list of Harwood poems, broken into three tiers of interest – Tier 1 being must-know poems that intricately relate to Harwood’s purpose, Tier 2 being high-value supporting poems, and Tier 3 being poems that can be used selectively to support particular arguments.
In my personal opinion, Violets is one of Harwood’s most beautifully constructed poems. As an elegiac lyric, it mourns the passage of time from both a child and adult perspective – the child speaker’s sadness at the loss of time and her poignant question of “Where’s morning gone?” mirrors the adult speaker’s lamentation of the loss of her years and existential questions of mortality. In defiance of the onward march of time and inevitability of death, the speaker revises this melancholy and recovers her sense of peace by returning quietly to her fond memories of the past. From the perspective of the Common Module, this poem crucially connects together the primary threads of Harwood’s work - her interest in the natural world, her response to the inevitability of death, and her philosophical perspective on transience. Thus, it acts as a vital anchor for other selected poems to navigate Harwood’s purpose - especially in relation to “emotions and qualities” of “individual and collective human experiences”.
At Mornington similarly follows the ontological vein that runs through Harwood’s body of work - the worth of life, given its transience and inevitable end at death. Being a longer poem, it offers a wide variety of quotes and language features to support your argument. It can also be interpreted in two main ways, enabling its flexibility within your essay: either (1) celebrating the beauty of the natural world, in its reminder to us of the beauty within transience, or (2) the value of interpersonal friendships to overcome our fears of death. Similar to ‘Violets’, this poem anchors together many of Harwood’s key authorial intentions, particularly responding to the Common Module’s interest in ideas of “identity, culture, acceptance, and growth”.
Although more challenging to analyse, The Sharpness of Death comes out on top for me as a Harwood favourite. It serves as Harwood’s tender critique of rigid and unyielding philosophy that relies upon cold logic to deny lived experiences, where Harwood instead values art as a fluid mechanism to recognise lived emotion. Broken into the quartet of numbered stanzas, Harwood celebrates the transient, temporary moments of the artist – “blossoms to hold the light that’s gone” – rather than male philosophers’ attempts to create permanent, fixed truths that ultimately prove unfulfilling. For an upper-band 6 essay, this is Harwood’s most explicitly metapoetic poem, and thus is a crucial inclusion if you are aiming to analyse her self-reflexive veneration of the poetic form.
A marker of Harwood’s ongoing interest in the passage of childhood to adolescence, The Glass Jar evokes a child’s disorienting psychological transition towards maturity, reflecting Harwood’s view of the inevitable passage of time. The tightly-structured sextets physically enact the architecture of the central symbol of the “glass jar”, reflecting the rigid safety of the vessel that the child hopes for in childhood. However, the “glass jar” ultimately symbolically breaks as the child must painfully recognise their loss of childhood innocence and reckon with the truths of adulthood. I would categorise this as a “supportive” poem because it is more narrowly focused on ideas of individual psychological maturation, rather than Harwood’s overarching interest in the passage of time and the natural world.
In mirror to this, Father and Child (I & II) offers a strong argument regarding Harwood’s view of the inevitable transition of adolescence. By opening with the visceral images of the child’s killing of the barn owl at daybreak, Harwood communicates a naïvety towards death which the child must unlearn. In ultimately doing so, the diptych form offers Part II at a contrasting nightfall, where the poem slows to a mature recognition of death in its full bitterness and grief. Similar to ‘The Glass Jar’, I consider this to be a suitable poem to support an overall argument about Harwood’s recognition and lamentation of the inevitable passage of time.
A Valediction is composed as a farewell lyric, echoed by Harwood’s classical restraint and marked fundamentally by its titular intertextual allusion to John Donne. This could be used to support arguments that have previously been outlined, related to Harwood’s evocation of beauty within the transience of life. It can also be used to support Harwood’s validation of female identity and sexuality in its references to Lou Salomé and Saint Therese of Lisieux. I would use this poem selectively as it is shorter in length and offers less variety in features and form for analysis compared to the previously listed poems.
Beyond Metaphor is the shortest of the prescribed poems, examining the limitations of language to capture the pain and brilliance of lived experiences, as captured in the line “I could not write them down.” To echo this, Harwood explicitly references the closing line of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (“Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.”) Although the poem features a fascinating argument that aligns with Harwood’s overarching metapoetic argument in favour of lived experience and transience above attempts to create permanent truths within language, I consider the poem too short to offer a substantial paragraph on its own. However, it is still quite a valid option to support an argument that focuses on Harwood’s views on art and philosophy.
It is crucial to sequence your selection of Harwood’s poems with reference to your argument, which can be understood in greater detail in the following section on Conceptual Lens. For Common Module, my recommendation is a 3-paragraph structure with each paragraph focusing on one poem, where your essay should evolve its argument as you trace through each poem. References can be made to poems outside of the core three within each paragraph to build a layered argument with scope on the oeuvre.
An alternative structure involves constructing 3 thematic paragraphs, with each paragraph being focused on a central idea of Harwood’s body of work and integrating evidence from a range of poems to support each point. Although this has the potential to work well, it is likely to become convoluted quickly and disrupt the precision of your analysis – so I would be very careful about implementing such a structure.
Below I offer 5 key conceptual lenses from which we may navigate Harwood’s poetry, allowing you to consider potential ways to structure your argument, and how these relate to key concepts listed in the Common Module rubric.
I consider this to be the vital underpinning thread of Harwood’s body of work, and also the one that relates the most closely to the concepts of the Common Module. Where ‘Violets’ initially establishes Harwood’s use of a childhood analogy to lament the inevitable passage of time, ‘At Mornington’ shifts us into the hope that interpersonal relationships may offer to accept mortality. Returning to the simple vignettes and memories of these relationships, ‘The Sharpness of Death’ rejects philosophical intellectualism and acts as a soaring conclusion to not only accept, but also to embrace mortality and death. Thus, this lens links to “emotions and qualities” of “individual and collective experiences” in Harwood’s evocation of human responses to the inevitable passage of time, and by extension, “invites readers to see the world differently” and “challenge assumptions” about mortality.
P1: Violets
P2: At Mornington
P3: The Sharpness of Death
We can also analyse these same three poems from the lens of philosophy and religion, while maintaining that core idea of their conceptual progression. The key difference lies in interpreting ‘Violets’ and ‘At Mornington’ from a more explicitly philosophical perspective, including focusing on their use of Christian imagery - light, water, and her “father’s house”. Aside from addressing the key concepts of “emotional and lived experiences” noted in the previous conceptual lens, this perspective also allows us to powerfully address “the paradoxes of motivation and behaviour”. While we may approach mortality with behaviours that are motivated by fear and avoidance, such as attempting to craft philosophical permanence, Harwood urges us to recognise that by embracing death, we may “paradoxically” discover greater value in the transience of life.
P1: Violets
P2: At Mornington
P3: The Sharpness of Death
Following on from her interest in warm, intimate experiences, Harwood’s body of work is also deeply interested in sculpting out the complexity of female selfhood and the beauty of womanhood. This acted as a fierce challenge to the patriarchal ideologies and standards enforced within her context, and resonates particularly in our understanding of Harwood as a confident and occasionally satirical female poet. This becomes particularly relevant for the concepts of “seeing the world differently and challenging assumptions”, and “the tension between agency and conformity” in the Common Module.
For our previous two lenses, ‘Violets’ was an opener for Harwood’s dialogue on the nature of death - here, ‘Violets’ can instead be read as a feminist veneration of the transcendent importance of feminine, domestic spaces. This can then be elevated with ‘A Valediction’ into Harwood’s praise of female romantic desire, which is enriched in her philosophical reverence for erotic desire in ‘The Sharpness of Death’.
P1: Violets
P2: A Valediction
P3: The Sharpness of Death
Much of Harwood’s work is invested in drawing upon influences from the natural world to communicate truths about human experiences, especially using symbols of Australiana in reference to the personal context underpinning her work. Using the extended symbol of daybreak and nightfall, ‘Father and Child (I & II)’ relate the transience of the natural world to our approach towards personal maturation and aging. This sentiment is then carried forward with ‘Violets’, which draws upon the extended natural symbol of the violets to offer a potential source of peace within this transience. This swells to a conclusion in ‘At Mornington’ as Harwood evolves the extended metaphor of water from initially an opponent to be conquered, to a resonant tranquillity that “bears” the speaker towards her death.
This underpins the Common Module’s focus on “emotional, physical, cultural and lived experiences”, and “identity, culture, acceptance and growth”, as Harwood draws upon these images of Australian nature and culture to invite us to “grow” in our perspective towards impermanence.
P1: Father and Child (I & II)
P2: Violets
P3: At Mornington
A final, slightly nicher, conceptual lens to view Harwood’s work is through the ideas of psychological growth and an individual’s maturation from childhood to adolescence to adulthood, which relates closely to Common Module ideas of “acceptance and growth”. While ‘The Glass Jar’ establishes universal human anxieties surrounding the unknown of adulthood, ‘Father and Child (I & II)’ offers potential salvation through guiding forces of family. This comes to a peaceful conclusion in ‘Violets’, where it is the sanctuary of family and love that secures the speaker against their fears of adulthood and the inevitable passage of time.
P1: The Glass Jar
P2: Father and Child (I & II)
P3: Violets
Common Module questions will frequently invite students to interpret the text through the conceptual lenses noted in the rubric, which can be broken down into the following:
Students will often be asked to interpret these lenses through:
We have already begun to consider how we may interpret Harwood’s body of work through these conceptual lenses, but it is important to continue to practise adapting your argument towards a range of Common Module-style questions to ensure that you can respond under timed conditions.
Here is a step-by-step process to navigating Common Module exam questions:
Below is an example of a possible Common Module question. Let’s consider how we would navigate it in relation to Harwood.
“Composers depict unique human experiences that invite us to reflect personally on ideas of acceptance and growth.”
Evaluate the extent to which you agree with the statement, referring closely to your prescribed text.
First, we can identify the key terms of the question as “unique human experiences”, “reflecting personally”, and “acceptance and growth”.
Second, we can think about how each of these terms apply to our understanding of Harwood’s purpose, and begin to connect them together:
Third, we can plan out how this interpretation would be sustained across our paragraphs. For example:
Fourth, we can write our essay, making continuous references back to the question as planned here!
My final piece of advice regarding understanding and writing about Harwood’s poetry for the Common Module is never lose focus on two key factors: form and context. Through your study, continue developing your sophisticated understanding of each. Although it is possible for any student to superficially comment that Harwood “talks about growing up” or “uses symbols of nature”, the rich intricacy of Harwood’s work is best understood when you recognise what underpins these conceptual interests - from her contextual interest in Wittgenstein’s philosophy to her careful poetic precision in meter that is reminiscent of her musical mind.
With these in mind, I hope this has laid a strong foundation for your navigation of Harwood’s poetry for the Common Module!